Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey

As part of the Wikimedia Movement strategic plan, regular surveys among Wikipedia editors are an important way to take the pulse of the community and identify pressing concerns and needs. We are happy to share results from the second editor survey that was conducted in December 2011. We began survey efforts in April 2011, and results from the first survey are available here. We would like to point out that although this blog post and the following ones will be looking at some trends across the April and December survey, 7-8 months is a rather short time to see statistically significant change on important indicators like gender distribution resulting from Wikimedia Foundation initiatives. Here are some demographic data about Wikipedia editors:

a. Wikipedia editors continue to be predominantly men

The gender distribution of Wikipedia editors hasn’t changed since the last survey. Among those surveyed, 90 percent self-identified as males, 9 percent as females and 1 percent as transsexual or transgender. That being said, there was a greater amount of female editors among those respondents who had joined more recently: Among editors who had joined in 2011, 14 percent were female compared to 10 percent for 2010, 9 percent for 2009 and 8 percent for editors who had joined in 2008 and participated in this survey. Possible explanations include that Wikipedia has been attracting a higher ratio of women recently, or that female editors leave the project sooner. There were no significant variations across the major language Wikipedias, with the exception of the Russian Wikipedia, which reported only 6 percent female editors. Also, out of all editors in the US, 15 percent are women, which is significantly higher than any other country of residence. Conversely, there are fewer male editors in US (85 percent) compared to other countries (UK, India, Brazil, Canada) where 90 percent or more of editors are males.  With initiatives like the Teahouse project that engages new editors through outreach, we hope to increase the number of female editors on Wikipedia.

(D15) What is your gender? (n=6503)

D15. What is your gender? n=6503

b. English Wikipedia continues to be the most read and edited Wikipedia

As we had found in the April 2011 survey, a large majority of Wikipedia editors read and edit the English version. Many editors that primarily make edits to another language Wikipedia also edit the English Wikipedia. While only 30 percent primarily edit the English Wikipedia, 63 percent contribute to it. Almost half of English Wikipedia editors reported other language Wikipedias as their primary project. Similarly, 86 percent of Wikipedia editors read the English Wikipedia, though only 38 percent read it primarily.

Q1a. Which language versions of Wikipedia do you CONTRIBUTE to? Please choose all that apply.

Q1b. Which language version of Wikipedia do you PRIMARILY CONTRIBUTE to? Please choose ONE.

Q2a. Which language versions of Wikipedia do you READ? Please choose all that apply.

Q2b. Which language version of Wikipedia do you PRIMARILY READ? Please choose ONE.

If you are interested learning more about Wikipedia editors – from age demographics to their editing experiences, please check out this space as we publish the long-awaited topline findings from the survey.

Mani Pande, Head of Global Development Research
Ayush Khanna, Data Analyst, Global Development

In December 2011, we conducted an online survey of Wikipedia editors in 17 languages. This is the first in a series of blog posts summarizing our findings. If you are interested, you can find out more about the methodology of the survey here.

6 Show

6 Comments on Nine out of ten Wikipedians continue to be men: Editor Survey

wikimediablog 11 months

I will leave the text as is for now, but upon review of the data, there appears to be a typo in this sentence: “Also, out of all editors in the US, 15 percent are women …”. This should read “14 percent”. It was already correctly stated as 14% in the country chart.


Rowena Burgess 2 years

Many thanks for making the effort in order to compose this really helpful update. Although the gender mix seems imbalanced, the methodology seems quite logical.

Mani Pande 4 years

Thanks Mike,
Great points. Here is some more information that you might find to be useful. There is a statistically significant difference between US and every other country shown in the bar graph. UK, Germany, MENA and Canada are not statistically significant from each other, but there is a statistically significant difference between them and India.
This survey (December 2011) and April 2011 have the same methodology i.e we screened out for those who don’t edit Wikipedia, but the UNU-Merit study included readers who tend to be more women. I would explain the difference in gender to methodology rather than decline.

Mike Peel 4 years

At what level are the statistics on the gender distribution significant? E.g. in “gender distribution across countries”, are the differences e.g. between Brazil (7%) and UK (9%) or US (14%) statistically significant, or are they within the uncertainties of the survey?

(The same applies to comparisons with this and previous surveys – I’ve heard people say that the gender balance used to be 13% in the first survey, then decreased to 9% in the second survey, indicating that it was getting worse – but I suspect the uncertainty here’s about 4% or so, i.e. consistent answers…)

usman 4 years

This is a very high rate of gender imbalance. Wikipedia needs to be proactive in addressing this gender imbalance.

Lvova 4 years

In Russia we want to know more to understand what is happening. Can I get a letter for more details, in particular, the sample size of Russia?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *