<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Wikimedia blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wikimedia.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org</link>
	<description>News from inside the Wikimedia Foundation.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Huffington Post readers select WMF ED as media game changer of the year by Huib!</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/19/huffington-post-readers-select-wmf-ed-as-media-game-changer-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1673</link>
		<dc:creator>Huib!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1282#comment-1673</guid>
		<description>Just my 2 cents but could we change the file in this post, maybe make it smaller or something?
It kind of looks very LQ on big screens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just my 2 cents but could we change the file in this post, maybe make it smaller or something?<br />
It kind of looks very LQ on big screens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Huffington Post readers select WMF ED as media game changer of the year by Huib!</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/19/huffington-post-readers-select-wmf-ed-as-media-game-changer-of-the-year/comment-page-1/#comment-1672</link>
		<dc:creator>Huib!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1282#comment-1672</guid>
		<description>Yay, this is nice :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, this is nice :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Because We Can builds a 3D sign globe for Wikimedia by Zauberer</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/02/because-we-can-builds-a-3d-sign-globe-for-wikimedia/comment-page-1/#comment-1671</link>
		<dc:creator>Zauberer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 22:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1180#comment-1671</guid>
		<description>Wikipedia is a magical website on the www. I just did a donation to it and so you should do, too. Regards, Zauberer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wikipedia is a magical website on the www. I just did a donation to it and so you should do, too. Regards, Zauberer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UX + Usability Study Take Two! by Наталья</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/18/ux-usability-study-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1670</link>
		<dc:creator>Наталья</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1206#comment-1670</guid>
		<description>Я вам пожертвую денег, когда будете принимать яндекс-деньги! Думаю, многие пользователи из России  того же мнения.

[Google translation: &quot;I will donate money, when you take Yandex-money! I think many users from Russia would be of the same opinion.&quot;]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Я вам пожертвую денег, когда будете принимать яндекс-деньги! Думаю, многие пользователи из России  того же мнения.</p>
<p>[Google translation: "I will donate money, when you take Yandex-money! I think many users from Russia would be of the same opinion."]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kicking off the 2009 Wikimedia Fundraiser by Wikimedia blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikipedia: 1/10 of the Webby&#8217;s most influential projects of the decade</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/11/kicking-off-the-2009-wikimedia-fundraiser/comment-page-1/#comment-1668</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikimedia blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikipedia: 1/10 of the Webby&#8217;s most influential projects of the decade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1211#comment-1668</guid>
		<description>[...] We&#8217;re excited to learn today that the Webby Awards have chosen Wikipedia as one of the ten most influential &#8220;Internet moments of the decade.&#8221; The timing is excellent as we&#8217;re now well-underway with our 6th annual fundraising drive.  It&#8217;s a great time to think about the extraordinary efforts of thousands of volunteers to make Wikipedia and its sister projects, and to make a donation to help ensure Wikipedia forever. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We&#8217;re excited to learn today that the Webby Awards have chosen Wikipedia as one of the ten most influential &#8220;Internet moments of the decade.&#8221; The timing is excellent as we&#8217;re now well-underway with our 6th annual fundraising drive.  It&#8217;s a great time to think about the extraordinary efforts of thousands of volunteers to make Wikipedia and its sister projects, and to make a donation to help ensure Wikipedia forever. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UX + Usability Study Take Two! by the wub</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/18/ux-usability-study-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1667</link>
		<dc:creator>the wub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1206#comment-1667</guid>
		<description>@Nihiltres: Many of the usability improvements, including Vector, are already the default on the English Wikinews. I&#039;m not sure if any other projects have done so, but I guess if a community reaches a clear consensus, they could also ask to be switched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nihiltres: Many of the usability improvements, including Vector, are already the default on the English Wikinews. I&#8217;m not sure if any other projects have done so, but I guess if a community reaches a clear consensus, they could also ask to be switched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UX + Usability Study Take Two! by Parul</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/18/ux-usability-study-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1666</link>
		<dc:creator>Parul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 23:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1206#comment-1666</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear it Nihiltres.  Making our changes default is definitely one of our goals, and it&#039;s great to have so much community support behind such a move.  But as of yet, there is not a definite timetable for that.  As you mentioned, we don&#039;t want to be making significant changes once deployed and we are still prototyping and trying a variety of exciting features and enhancements.  Also, as you can see with this study, we&#039;ve also surfaced many ways to improve tools we&#039;ve already released in Beta.  The best answer we can give is:  not yet.  Yet being the operative word!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear it Nihiltres.  Making our changes default is definitely one of our goals, and it&#8217;s great to have so much community support behind such a move.  But as of yet, there is not a definite timetable for that.  As you mentioned, we don&#8217;t want to be making significant changes once deployed and we are still prototyping and trying a variety of exciting features and enhancements.  Also, as you can see with this study, we&#8217;ve also surfaced many ways to improve tools we&#8217;ve already released in Beta.  The best answer we can give is:  not yet.  Yet being the operative word!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UX + Usability Study Take Two! by Nihiltres</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/18/ux-usability-study-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>Nihiltres</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1206#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>I may be missing something, but is there any sort of timetable yet as to when we can expect to start seeing these improvements *by default* on &quot;live&quot; Wikimedia projects? I&#039;m a big fan of Vector; as an advanced user, I have been using it since it came out. What I&#039;m really looking forward to, however, is having the improvements delivered to newbies, the sort who see such a positive change from your study! I realize that the improvements are ongoing: it&#039;s understandable to delay as we don&#039;t want the interface to change significantly every other week. I&#039;m simply eager.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be missing something, but is there any sort of timetable yet as to when we can expect to start seeing these improvements *by default* on &#8220;live&#8221; Wikimedia projects? I&#8217;m a big fan of Vector; as an advanced user, I have been using it since it came out. What I&#8217;m really looking forward to, however, is having the improvements delivered to newbies, the sort who see such a positive change from your study! I realize that the improvements are ongoing: it&#8217;s understandable to delay as we don&#8217;t want the interface to change significantly every other week. I&#8217;m simply eager.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UX + Usability Study Take Two! by Wikipedia Usability Study, pt. 2 » Bolt &#124; Peters</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/18/ux-usability-study-take-two/comment-page-1/#comment-1664</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia Usability Study, pt. 2 » Bolt &#124; Peters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 19:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1206#comment-1664</guid>
		<description>[...] done a post on the process over at the Wikimedia blog, where you can read the report (with videos forthcoming!). And also [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] done a post on the process over at the Wikimedia blog, where you can read the report (with videos forthcoming!). And also [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kicking off the 2009 Wikimedia Fundraiser by John</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2009/11/11/kicking-off-the-2009-wikimedia-fundraiser/comment-page-1/#comment-1663</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 03:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=1211#comment-1663</guid>
		<description>As much as I like wikipedia and would love to see it last forever I don&#039;t see how this particular fundraiser helps that goal. It is almost misleading to even say wikimedia &quot;foundation&quot; when really it is just a standard year to year nonprofit. If my donations really were going to a foundation whose principle was never touched and wikipedia ran off of the interest I would donate. As it is it doesn&#039;t matter how much people give this year, they will have to give the same amount or more next year just to ensure the survival of wikipedia. That to me seems very irresponsible and I will wait to donate anything until wikipedia dies from lack of donations and someone restarts it as a true foundation that will last forever or the wikimedia &quot;foundation&quot; makes it possible for me to take foundation out of quotes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I like wikipedia and would love to see it last forever I don&#8217;t see how this particular fundraiser helps that goal. It is almost misleading to even say wikimedia &#8220;foundation&#8221; when really it is just a standard year to year nonprofit. If my donations really were going to a foundation whose principle was never touched and wikipedia ran off of the interest I would donate. As it is it doesn&#8217;t matter how much people give this year, they will have to give the same amount or more next year just to ensure the survival of wikipedia. That to me seems very irresponsible and I will wait to donate anything until wikipedia dies from lack of donations and someone restarts it as a true foundation that will last forever or the wikimedia &#8220;foundation&#8221; makes it possible for me to take foundation out of quotes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
