<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In divisive times, Wikipedia brings political opponents together</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/11/05/in-divisive-times-wikipedia-brings-political-opponents-together/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/11/05/in-divisive-times-wikipedia-brings-political-opponents-together/</link>
	<description>News from the Wikimedia Foundation and about the Wikimedia movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta2-24176</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia, A Place for Political Dialogue &#171; EJO &#8211; European Journalism Observatory</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/11/05/in-divisive-times-wikipedia-brings-political-opponents-together/comment-page-1/#comment-181017</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia, A Place for Political Dialogue &#171; EJO &#8211; European Journalism Observatory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=18959#comment-181017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] do Wikipedians prefer discussions with diverse opinions and views? Using statistical instruments, researchers synthetized the data and found “no statistically significant preference for either inter- or intra-party interaction” on [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] do Wikipedians prefer discussions with diverse opinions and views? Using statistical instruments, researchers synthetized the data and found “no statistically significant preference for either inter- or intra-party interaction” on [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Der letzte Ort, der nicht politisch polarisiert ist: Wikipedia &#124; Wiki-Watch-Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/11/05/in-divisive-times-wikipedia-brings-political-opponents-together/comment-page-1/#comment-175691</link>
		<dc:creator>Der letzte Ort, der nicht politisch polarisiert ist: Wikipedia &#124; Wiki-Watch-Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2012 13:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=18959#comment-175691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] schätzen das Netzwerk genau aus diesen Grund: Sie suchen nach neutralen Informationen in Zeiten hitziger politischer Schlachten. Die Studie zeigt, dass es trotz der zunehmenden Spaltung der USA immer noch Bereiche gibt, in [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] schätzen das Netzwerk genau aus diesen Grund: Sie suchen nach neutralen Informationen in Zeiten hitziger politischer Schlachten. Die Studie zeigt, dass es trotz der zunehmenden Spaltung der USA immer noch Bereiche gibt, in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morning Toolbox &#8211; November 9, 2012 &#8211; Bond Friday &#171; Skeptical Software Tools</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/11/05/in-divisive-times-wikipedia-brings-political-opponents-together/comment-page-1/#comment-172864</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning Toolbox &#8211; November 9, 2012 &#8211; Bond Friday &#171; Skeptical Software Tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 14:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=18959#comment-172864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The US is breathing a bit of a sigh of relief now that the election is over &#8211; in part because of the divisiveness that is so common. Researchers studying Wikipedia found that problem does not extend to editors on the project. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The US is breathing a bit of a sigh of relief now that the election is over &#8211; in part because of the divisiveness that is so common. Researchers studying Wikipedia found that problem does not extend to editors on the project. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Last Place in America That&#8217;s Not Politically Polarized: Wikipedia &#171; MattsLens</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/11/05/in-divisive-times-wikipedia-brings-political-opponents-together/comment-page-1/#comment-170233</link>
		<dc:creator>The Last Place in America That&#8217;s Not Politically Polarized: Wikipedia &#171; MattsLens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=18959#comment-170233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Though in the lead-up to today&#8217;s election news organizations somehow kept unearthing supposedly undecided voters to interview, today&#8217;s American political discussion is in fact ridiculously polarized and unfriendly &#8212; on TV, on blogs, on Twitter, on Facebook and IRL. But Wikipedia editors, it turns out, can get past their differences and have reasonable discussions across party lines about controversial political topics. That is, according to a study by researchers from USC and the Barcelona Media Foundation, found via the Wikimedia blog. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Though in the lead-up to today&#8217;s election news organizations somehow kept unearthing supposedly undecided voters to interview, today&#8217;s American political discussion is in fact ridiculously polarized and unfriendly &#8212; on TV, on blogs, on Twitter, on Facebook and IRL. But Wikipedia editors, it turns out, can get past their differences and have reasonable discussions across party lines about controversial political topics. That is, according to a study by researchers from USC and the Barcelona Media Foundation, found via the Wikimedia blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Last Place in America That&#8217;s Not Politically Polarized: Wikipedia - Liz Gannes - News - AllThingsD</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/11/05/in-divisive-times-wikipedia-brings-political-opponents-together/comment-page-1/#comment-170220</link>
		<dc:creator>The Last Place in America That&#8217;s Not Politically Polarized: Wikipedia - Liz Gannes - News - AllThingsD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2012 21:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=18959#comment-170220</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Though in the lead-up to today&#8217;s election, news organizations somehow kept unearthing supposedly undecided voters to interview, today&#8217;s American political discussion is ridiculously polarized and unfriendly &#8212; on TV, on blogs, on Twitter and Facebook, and IRL. But Wikipedia editors, it turns out, can get past their political differences and have reasonable discussions across party lines about controversial political topics. At least that&#8217;s according to a study by researchers from USC and the Barcelona Media Foundation, found via the Wikimedia blog. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Though in the lead-up to today&#8217;s election, news organizations somehow kept unearthing supposedly undecided voters to interview, today&#8217;s American political discussion is ridiculously polarized and unfriendly &#8212; on TV, on blogs, on Twitter and Facebook, and IRL. But Wikipedia editors, it turns out, can get past their political differences and have reasonable discussions across party lines about controversial political topics. At least that&#8217;s according to a study by researchers from USC and the Barcelona Media Foundation, found via the Wikimedia blog. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: blog.wikimedia.org @ 2013-05-20 20:11:50 by W3 Total Cache -->