Comments on: Wikimedia UK and Wikimedia Foundation appoint independent reviewer http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/10/24/wikimedia-uk-and-wikimedia-foundation-appoint-independent-reviewer/ News from the Wikimedia Foundation and about the Wikimedia movement Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:06:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta2-24176 By: John Byrne http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/10/24/wikimedia-uk-and-wikimedia-foundation-appoint-independent-reviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-164825 John Byrne Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:20:47 +0000 http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=18235#comment-164825 Doesn’t look fixed yet on mine (cache?). It’s January 31st, as per the WMUK site.

]]> By: Matthew Roth http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/10/24/wikimedia-uk-and-wikimedia-foundation-appoint-independent-reviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-164818 Matthew Roth Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:36:51 +0000 http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=18235#comment-164818 I believe you are correct, Tom. Fixed.

]]> By: Tom Morris http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/10/24/wikimedia-uk-and-wikimedia-foundation-appoint-independent-reviewer/comment-page-1/#comment-164816 Tom Morris Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:33:22 +0000 http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=18235#comment-164816 “We anticipate the review will be published by mid January 31 2013, and in any event by 15 February 2013.”

I believe you mean either mid-January or January 31. It cannot be both. ;-)

]]>