Comments on: Wikimedia engineering July 2012 report http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/08/02/engineering-july-2012-report/ News from the Wikimedia Foundation and about the Wikimedia movement Tue, 18 Jun 2013 21:06:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta2-24176 By: Guillaume Paumier http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/08/02/engineering-july-2012-report/comment-page-1/#comment-133758 Guillaume Paumier Thu, 09 Aug 2012 14:04:59 +0000 http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=16800#comment-133758 Ah, I had missed that message, thank you. The last method I had seen was this one and it seemed painful. I’ll try the method you linked to and I’ll update the numbers.

]]> By: Harry Burt http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/08/02/engineering-july-2012-report/comment-page-1/#comment-133028 Harry Burt Mon, 06 Aug 2012 22:22:48 +0000 http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=16800#comment-133028 Ah right, I thought perhaps a reliable method had been found [1]?

Harry
[1] http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/wikitech/283396#283396

]]> By: Guillaume Paumier http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/08/02/engineering-july-2012-report/comment-page-1/#comment-132946 Guillaume Paumier Mon, 06 Aug 2012 15:14:04 +0000 http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=16800#comment-132946 Harry: Seeing that I had the choice between an unreliable method, or an extremely tedious one, I decided not to include that number until the Analytics team can provide a reliable metric without having to jump through hoops. Hopefully, they’ll provide historical data and we can add that number retroactively.

]]> By: Harry Burt http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/08/02/engineering-july-2012-report/comment-page-1/#comment-132781 Harry Burt Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:26:00 +0000 http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=16800#comment-132781 No figure for number of contributors to Gerrit in July?

]]>