<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US Education Program participants add three times as much quality content as regular new users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/19/wikipedia-education-program-stats-fall-2011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/19/wikipedia-education-program-stats-fall-2011/</link>
	<description>News from the Wikimedia Foundation and about the Wikimedia movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:19:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta2-24176</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ayush Khanna</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/19/wikipedia-education-program-stats-fall-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-106935</link>
		<dc:creator>Ayush Khanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2012 22:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=11184#comment-106935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comments.

@Harry:
The goal of the program is to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles. That said, we are working towards increasing retention of students after the academic semester ends.

@James:
Re 1: A quantitative approach is definitely not the complete picture, but we feel it is a very good approximation. Qualitative research will be more accurate, but also requires a considerably greater amount of effort. That said, we are working with a few community members on defining qualitative metrics for evaluating the program. Please join the discussion at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard#Suggested_approach_to_metrics_for_student-edited_articles if you are interested.
Re 2: See my response to Harry. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.</p>
<p>@Harry:<br />
The goal of the program is to improve the quality of Wikipedia articles. That said, we are working towards increasing retention of students after the academic semester ends.</p>
<p>@James:<br />
Re 1: A quantitative approach is definitely not the complete picture, but we feel it is a very good approximation. Qualitative research will be more accurate, but also requires a considerably greater amount of effort. That said, we are working with a few community members on defining qualitative metrics for evaluating the program. Please join the discussion at <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard#Suggested_approach_to_metrics_for_student-edited_articles" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard#Suggested_approach_to_metrics_for_student-edited_articles</a> if you are interested.<br />
Re 2: See my response to Harry. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Het succes van het Wikipedia Educatie Programma &#171; Wiki loves bieb</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/19/wikipedia-education-program-stats-fall-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-104227</link>
		<dc:creator>Het succes van het Wikipedia Educatie Programma &#171; Wiki loves bieb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 05:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=11184#comment-104227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] internationale Wikipedia Educatie Programma werpt vruchten af. Wikimedia maakte vorige week bekend dat deelnemers aan dit programma drie keer zo veel kwaliteitsbijdragen op Wikipedia plaatsen dan [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] internationale Wikipedia Educatie Programma werpt vruchten af. Wikimedia maakte vorige week bekend dat deelnemers aan dit programma drie keer zo veel kwaliteitsbijdragen op Wikipedia plaatsen dan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Heilman</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/19/wikipedia-education-program-stats-fall-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-103850</link>
		<dc:creator>James Heilman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 21:26:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=11184#comment-103850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of comments:
1)Just because more bytes of students text stay on Wikipedia than bytes of a random new user does not necessarily mean that they contribute more quality content. It might mean that they are editing less closely watched pages and thus concerning edits are less frequently picked and reverted up by the community.
*Do not mean to be the devils advocate but the only way to determine if the text is of good quality is to manually go over every change that is made by students and every change that is made by a group of random new users. Per a good study design this should be done by at least two independent people with a third providing input if the two do not agree on the assessment.
2)Per &quot;An important consideration for any outreach project is editor retention. Data showed that students who are introduced to editing Wikipedia through the U.S. Education Program are just as likely to continue editing as any other newcomer.&quot; We all agree that editor retention of new users is very poor. That this project only matches it is a little disappointing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of comments:<br />
1)Just because more bytes of students text stay on Wikipedia than bytes of a random new user does not necessarily mean that they contribute more quality content. It might mean that they are editing less closely watched pages and thus concerning edits are less frequently picked and reverted up by the community.<br />
*Do not mean to be the devils advocate but the only way to determine if the text is of good quality is to manually go over every change that is made by students and every change that is made by a group of random new users. Per a good study design this should be done by at least two independent people with a third providing input if the two do not agree on the assessment.<br />
2)Per &#8220;An important consideration for any outreach project is editor retention. Data showed that students who are introduced to editing Wikipedia through the U.S. Education Program are just as likely to continue editing as any other newcomer.&#8221; We all agree that editor retention of new users is very poor. That this project only matches it is a little disappointing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harry Burt</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/19/wikipedia-education-program-stats-fall-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-103775</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry Burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 15:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=11184#comment-103775</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Data showed that students who are introduced to editing Wikipedia through the U.S. Education Program are just as likely to continue editing as any other newcomer.&quot; Slightly disappointing, I would say :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Data showed that students who are introduced to editing Wikipedia through the U.S. Education Program are just as likely to continue editing as any other newcomer.&#8221; Slightly disappointing, I would say :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Semaine 16 &#8211; 1 240 634 articles &#171; Les échos d&#039;en bas</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/19/wikipedia-education-program-stats-fall-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-103725</link>
		<dc:creator>Semaine 16 &#8211; 1 240 634 articles &#171; Les échos d&#039;en bas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=11184#comment-103725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] et Meta : le programme pour l&#8217;éducation de Wikipédia donnerait de bons résultats (lien) ■ Le 20 Avril est maintenant le Justin Knapp Day, du nom d&#8217;un contributeur qui a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] et Meta : le programme pour l&#8217;éducation de Wikipédia donnerait de bons résultats (lien) ■ Le 20 Avril est maintenant le Justin Knapp Day, du nom d&#8217;un contributeur qui a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 χρόνια, 1 εκατομμύριο Edits, 0 δολάρια: O απένταρος Superstar του Wikipedia &#124; TECH . BUZZ . GREECE</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/19/wikipedia-education-program-stats-fall-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-103692</link>
		<dc:creator>7 χρόνια, 1 εκατομμύριο Edits, 0 δολάρια: O απένταρος Superstar του Wikipedia &#124; TECH . BUZZ . GREECE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=11184#comment-103692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] US Education Program participants add three times as much quality content as regular new users (wikimedia.org)   37.979180 23.716647 Rate this:  Μοιραστείτε το :FacebookTwitterPinterestEmailDiggLinkedInRedditStumbleUponPrintTumblrLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   This entry was posted in Διαδίκτυο and tagged Battle of Fort Sumter, Editing, Encyclopedia, Justin Knapp, Open Content, Open source, Wikipedia, Woody Guthrie. Bookmark the permalink.    &#8592; Big &#8220;Black Box&#8221; Brother σε όλα τα αυτοκίνητα στις ΗΠΑ από το&#160;2015 [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] US Education Program participants add three times as much quality content as regular new users (wikimedia.org)   37.979180 23.716647 Rate this:  Μοιραστείτε το :FacebookTwitterPinterestEmailDiggLinkedInRedditStumbleUponPrintTumblrLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post.   This entry was posted in Διαδίκτυο and tagged Battle of Fort Sumter, Editing, Encyclopedia, Justin Knapp, Open Content, Open source, Wikipedia, Woody Guthrie. Bookmark the permalink.    &larr; Big &#8220;Black Box&#8221; Brother σε όλα τα αυτοκίνητα στις ΗΠΑ από το&nbsp;2015 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7 χρόνια, 1 εκατομμύριο Edits, 0 δολάρια: O απένταρος Superstar του Wikipedia &#124; TECH . BUZZ . GREECE</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/04/19/wikipedia-education-program-stats-fall-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-103689</link>
		<dc:creator>7 χρόνια, 1 εκατομμύριο Edits, 0 δολάρια: O απένταρος Superstar του Wikipedia &#124; TECH . BUZZ . GREECE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Apr 2012 10:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=11184#comment-103689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] US Education Program participants add three times as much quality content as regular new users (wikimedia.org)   37.979180 23.716647 Rate this:  Μοιραστείτε το :FacebookTwitterPinterestEmailDiggLinkedInRedditStumbleUponPrintTumblrLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] US Education Program participants add three times as much quality content as regular new users (wikimedia.org)   37.979180 23.716647 Rate this:  Μοιραστείτε το :FacebookTwitterPinterestEmailDiggLinkedInRedditStumbleUponPrintTumblrLike this:LikeBe the first to like this post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: blog.wikimedia.org @ 2013-05-23 03:38:53 by W3 Total Cache -->