Thank you for over the years of delivering to the public many well-written and research articles of historicity. Your scholarship is admired by myself, as I am sure by millions who use Wikipedia as reference. I have been on and helped to raise funds for ‘non-profit’ organizations. So, therefore, the phrase, non-profit, does not mean salary, nice offices, travel expenses, and the like. It is used for bylaws and governmental protection, or I should rephrase, stay the Government.

If I may offer one suggestion, your writers are in more than a few cases bias. I which not to refer to any one specific article, for there were many in the area of my research. Allow me to give a few examples, not quotes; however generalized tones to address, what I believe is an issue.

Recently I did hundreds of hours reading books and relying upon your staff’s writings to present a brief on the History of the Goths and the Franks.

In exclusively all articles from this organization, from ‘King Gundioc of the Burgundians’ to ‘Cassander King of Sicambri,’ did I find anything in any of your informative scholarly articles by slanderous and either not research thoroughly, or extremely dislike the the Sicambrian and the Germatic Empires, as if they wore only loin cloths and were ax-wielding brainless killers. While yet in the similar articles, the Romans, who historically can be shown had miles of suffering individuals crucified on roadways from town to town. I am a scholar as well, and a Scientific, Religious Philosopher. The fact that the Roman Emperors and Senators and Council wore silk attire, did make them more civil. There were political killing on thrones, as there were in the “Tribes.”

I will assist to bring you forward in time. I am sure that over 2 million Armenians marched themselves in the mountains and killed themselves, while the women cut off their own breasts.

Hitler, (not the German race), declared the Nazi Empire as the Greatest in the World, which would shine, showing the World how pure a race could be. I am sure the 4.5 million Jews took their own gas filled showers, or liked to bake themselves in ovens, starving themselves in death camps. Have I have made my point rather transparent?

In on specific article, the reference to the Sicambrian Empire was ‘tribes,’ giving the reader of non-Royal Society. I also have done research. Had it not been for this type; ie, King Walter with William the Conquer, according to a very notable historian, the ‘tribes’ in the Germanic,Frankish Tribes,screaming as they were killing the poor Romans, who also instigated more wars for the sake of bringing learning and nobility to the other nations, if it were not for King Walter de Lacy – the Spanish, French German,and especially the British Empires would have not reached the heights of Royalty which they do enjoy today. The de Lacy blood runs through all Royalty. Or did you not know that?

What is your thinking? That Alfred the Great King of England had modern weaponry to kill his enemy? No, we, as a civilized world do that today with our missiles and guns.

The most blatant remark in one of the articles in Wikipedia, was a byline on a picture of a coin of that era, showing the figure wearing a mustache as facial hair. The caption indicated,’Here is a coin of the early Franks, depicting a man wearing the “barbarian” mustache.’ Well, by that classification of appearance, I would state that one half of the male population working as executive, are Barbarians. Many of your writing staff may be as well.

I do not appreciate your extreme bias in your written word. The Romans were not civil. Neither are we. Think it over.

Respectfully