<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Announcing the Official Wikipedia Android App</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/</link>
	<description>News from the Wikimedia Foundation and about the Wikimedia movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta2-24176</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomasz</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-1/#comment-91698</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomasz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 22:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-91698</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Jonathan Stark: There was an community debate wether we should bother at all. Long and short of it was that our users deserve to have a choice of a great Wikipedia browsing experience that is add free and supports basic features on their Android devices. People ware paying to not have to see ads and to have basic features like saving an article to their phone. We thought this was a bit silly given that you don&#039;t have to pay anything to do this on a desktop when browsing Wikipedia.

Alongside this there are numerous carriers that we work with who are eager to install an official app on devices that they release. 

Lastly it lets us prototype, test, and experiment much faster then our normal MediaWiki pipeline allows. Plus its just fun to experiment with.

We should have some stats on app vs mobile web traffic in a couple of weeks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jonathan Stark: There was an community debate wether we should bother at all. Long and short of it was that our users deserve to have a choice of a great Wikipedia browsing experience that is add free and supports basic features on their Android devices. People ware paying to not have to see ads and to have basic features like saving an article to their phone. We thought this was a bit silly given that you don&#8217;t have to pay anything to do this on a desktop when browsing Wikipedia.</p>
<p>Alongside this there are numerous carriers that we work with who are eager to install an official app on devices that they release. </p>
<p>Lastly it lets us prototype, test, and experiment much faster then our normal MediaWiki pipeline allows. Plus its just fun to experiment with.</p>
<p>We should have some stats on app vs mobile web traffic in a couple of weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La connaissance au fond de ta poche. &#124; Oneig&#039;s cell</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-2/#comment-85728</link>
		<dc:creator>La connaissance au fond de ta poche. &#124; Oneig&#039;s cell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 13:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-85728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Pour en savoir plus vous pouvez consulter l&#8217;article sur le blog Wikipedia : Ici [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pour en savoir plus vous pouvez consulter l&#8217;article sur le blog Wikipedia : Ici [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-2/#comment-82547</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-82547</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia discusses the development of its app - Knowledge in your hands &#124; Knowledge in your hands</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-2/#comment-81256</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia discusses the development of its app - Knowledge in your hands &#124; Knowledge in your hands</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 05:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-81256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; Android News</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-1/#comment-78706</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; Android News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-78706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; Tech Hard &#62;&#62; All News Technology &#60;&#60;</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-1/#comment-78468</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; Tech Hard &#62;&#62; All News Technology &#60;&#60;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-78468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; Android Phones Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-1/#comment-78457</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; Android Phones Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-78457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] w&amp;#1110th a 4.5 star average rating. An&amp;#1281 now, th&amp;#1077 team behind th&amp;#1077 app h&amp;#1072&amp;#1109 posted a blog unfolding th&amp;#1077 development [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] w&amp;#1110th a 4.5 star average rating. An&amp;#1281 now, th&amp;#1077 team behind th&amp;#1077 app h&amp;#1072&amp;#1109 posted a blog unfolding th&amp;#1077 development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; Aspirepad</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-1/#comment-78455</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; Aspirepad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 02:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-78455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Stark</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-1/#comment-78428</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Stark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-78428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Congrats on the release! And I applaud your use of open web technologies + PhoneGap (now called Apache Cordova, I&#039;m told). 

I&#039;m curious whether there was an internal debate over whether to develop an app store app at all and what the reasoning was. I assume it was a question of discovery but it&#039;d be interesting to know. 

Also wondering what effect all those native app download have had on your mobile traffic, in particular whether it&#039;s all incremental or has canabalized your mobile web traffic at all. 

Cheers!
j]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats on the release! And I applaud your use of open web technologies + PhoneGap (now called Apache Cordova, I&#8217;m told). </p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious whether there was an internal debate over whether to develop an app store app at all and what the reasoning was. I assume it was a question of discovery but it&#8217;d be interesting to know. </p>
<p>Also wondering what effect all those native app download have had on your mobile traffic, in particular whether it&#8217;s all incremental or has canabalized your mobile web traffic at all. </p>
<p>Cheers!<br />
j</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; My Android</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2012/01/26/announcing-the-official-wikipedia-android-app/comment-page-1/#comment-78396</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedia discusses the development of its app &#124; My Android</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=9256#comment-78396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] up over 500,000 downloads with a 4.5 star average rating. And now, the team behind the app has posted a blog describing the development [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: blog.wikimedia.org @ 2013-05-24 00:54:58 by W3 Total Cache -->