<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Readers in US, Russia, Germany and India are the most pleased with Wikipedia Article Quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/11/09/wikipedia-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/11/09/wikipedia-quality/</link>
	<description>News from the Wikimedia Foundation and about the Wikimedia movement</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 22:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.6-beta2-24176</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCO (Teh IP)</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/11/09/wikipedia-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-35307</link>
		<dc:creator>TCO (Teh IP)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=7417#comment-35307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are the differnces even meaningful?  Instead of saying who likes us better, the real story is people feel Wiki is a 7.5.

I think that is about right, really.  There&#039;s a lot of good dope in the Wiki.  And it is super convenient.  That said, it&#039;s not bristling with brilliant writing and many topics have inadequate articles or just look sorta patchwork.

But a 7.5 is &quot;good&quot;.  Certainly something to be proud of.  Who would have thought it would grow into the mega thing that it has!?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are the differnces even meaningful?  Instead of saying who likes us better, the real story is people feel Wiki is a 7.5.</p>
<p>I think that is about right, really.  There&#8217;s a lot of good dope in the Wiki.  And it is super convenient.  That said, it&#8217;s not bristling with brilliant writing and many topics have inadequate articles or just look sorta patchwork.</p>
<p>But a 7.5 is &#8220;good&#8221;.  Certainly something to be proud of.  Who would have thought it would grow into the mega thing that it has!?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: blog.wikimedia.org @ 2013-05-25 06:08:18 by W3 Total Cache -->