About “Global”: the names basically reflect the way the Foundation is structured: with a Tech department, a Community department, and a Global development department. The latter encompasses activities like the India and Brazil initiatives, Mobile strategy, Business and Wikimania. It’s difficult to find another word to describe all these activities (“Regional” wouldn’t fit with Mobile, for example), so in the end we stuck to the name of the department.

Rob: Thanks for adding that. I’ll mention it in the monthly engineering report as well.

However I find the names a little odd. I would expect “Highlights” to be a selection from the other categories, rather than a category in its own right. “Highlights” should perhaps be called “Foundation”. A real “highlights” category is a good idea too though. “Community” is great (I imagine/hope you would also accept posts from community members on occasion).

Finally “Global” is quite odd, creating a separate category for it implies that some things that Wikimedia does are _not_ global, which… doesn’t make sense to me. It also implies there are some things that are “local” which again, maybe WMF is in the US, but since Sue has been at the helm I have always found the Foundation to really embrace a global attitude.

So maybe, more accurate would be “Chapters”, Wikimania stuff could go under “Foundation” or “Community” (or a new category “Events” could be cool – could include GLAM stuff too), as for “Business”, I am not sure what that would constitute [and if anything was the opposite of "global" my guess is it would be business dealings], but I guess it could also go under “Foundation”.

Anyway there’s my nitpicks :)