Wikimedia blog

News from the Wikimedia Foundation and about the Wikimedia movement

Archive for May, 2011

Montana Campus Ambassadors recruit new Wikipedians

Campus Ambassadors at MSU
Campus Ambassador Mike Cline and MSU Bozeman Wikipedia student club member Autumn LaBuff teach interested people about Wikipedia at a table in the student union building at Montana State University.

Mike Cline is a long-time Wikipedia contributor, and Bonnie McCallum is a long-time Wikipedia evangelist — together, they form the Campus Ambassador pod at Montana State University. And over the course of the last five months, Mike and Bonnie have transformed Bozeman, Montana, into a Wikipedia hub.

They’ve supported MSU Professor Kristin Ruppel’s class, “Federal Indian Policy and Law,” this term, as she assigned her students to edit Wikipedia articles as part of the curriculum. They are starting a Wikipedia student club on the Bozeman campus. They had a Wikipedia information table set up in the student union building. They’ve set up office hours in the university library, where they answer student questions related to Wikipedia. They’re preparing to present about their Wikipedia experiences to the Tribal College Librarians Institute in June, and they’ve already registered for a Wikipedia booth at Catapolooza, a campus-wide festival in August.

“I believe it’s important to demonstrate to academics that Wikipedia is a place of scholarship and that academia should be engaged and participating in Wikipedia,” Bonnie says. “So far, I’ve not met, or talked to, or emailed a single person who does not use Wikipedia, and it is fun for me to be able to tell folks that MSU-Bozeman has a graduate class that instead of writing term papers writes articles to Wikipedia.”

The Wikipedia Ambassador Program originated with the Public Policy Initiative, but it’s been growing ever since. Volunteer Campus Ambassadors like Bonnie and Mike work in class with students who have been assigned to edit Wikipedia for part of their course grade. Online Ambassadors are their virtual counterparts, helping students on-wiki and through IRC. Campus Ambassadors can be either experienced Wikipedians like Mike or new editors who have a lot of enthusiasm for teaching others about Wikipedia like Bonnie.

“The best part about being a Campus Ambassador is the opportunity to work with young students and adults on interesting academic subjects and the opportunity to convince academia that Wikipedia is indeed a valuable and reliable source of scholarship,” Mike says. “Students who took their Wikipedia assignment seriously were sincerely appreciative of the mentoring and help provided by the Ambassadors.”

Mike and Bonnie supported Professor Ruppel’s students via in-class presentations on Wikipedia editing and culture, Q&A sessions, pep talks, weekly office hours in the academic library, one-on-one counseling by appointment, and a class-time lab session in the library computer classroom. Bonnie, on staff at MSU Bozeman, got the library blog to post an item about their project, and the student newspaper covered their activities as well. Each of Bonnie and Mike’s outreach activities brings more people on board to their new Wikipedia student club, whose activities will begin in the fall term.

“Everyone, students and staff alike, always respond with ‘I use Wikipedia!’ Then they immediately add something like ‘That’s cool!’ or ‘How does that work?’ or ‘I had no idea that was going on,’ or ‘But I thought Wikipedia couldn’t be trusted,’” Bonnie says. “Telling people about being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador opens up a door to conversations about their own Wikipedia experiences, and we can explain about neutral point-of-view, tertiary source, verifiability, notability, the history tab, and other projects at Wikimedia besides Wikipedia. Most folks are surprised to find out they’re already empowered to become active Wikipedians. They’ve just never thought about Wikipedia from the collaborative, participative perspective before.”

As the spring term wraps up, Bonnie and Mike are busy meeting with Professor Ruppel to debrief about how the first term went. Professor Ruppel is already planning to use Wikipedia again in her class next term, and Bonnie and Mike are identifying what worked best and what they should do differently next time around. They’re also trying to recruit more Campus Ambassadors on the MSU-Bozeman campus. And they’d like to expand Wikipedia Campus Ambassador presence to the entire Montana University System: all Montana State University (MSU) system campuses, all University of Montana (U of M) system campuses, all seven Montana Tribal Colleges and three Community Colleges, and all three Montana Independent Colleges. They want to see Wikipedia editing as part of the curriculum in every college in Montana.

It’s an ambitious goal, but if anyone can do it, it’s Bonnie and Mike. In Mike’s regular job, he teaches and mentors groups of corporate leaders and teams on a variety of business processes, so expanding his teaching to Wikipedia is a logical step. Bonnie’s professional experience in the semiconductor and IT industries gave her a deep appreciation for open-source, shared knowledge, tools, and applications.

“Volunteering my time and energies in support of a worldwide free-access, neutral point-of-view, and verifiable information repository such as Wikipedia is a path I am willing to travel,” Bonnie says. “Wikipedia Campus Ambassadorship is for those who like a challenge, are comfortable working with unknowns, like working with others to solve problems, and enjoy constantly learning new stuff. Nothing is written in stone. In fact, there are no stones. The upside to the days when one is feeling like you’re walking around in a wiki-daze is that you know you’re building something wonderful for the whole world to use for free. You just steady-on.”

LiAnna Davis
Communications Associate – Public Policy Initiative

GLAMCamp NYC leads to work on software, outreach, and more

Glam Camp NYC header dark

While GLAMCamp NYC finished on Sunday (Signpost coverage), the work initiated there will continue throughout the GLAM community.  Representatives from cultural institutions and Wikimedia chapters, as well as individuals, are working on several projects.  The projects concerning web badges for free culture allies, a metadata standard for use in the mass uploader/data ingestion tool, and the web analytics proposal are in particular seeking contributors and project managers; please comment at the coordination page to signal your interest.

Also available: the collaborative notes from Friday, Saturday, and Sunday, and specifically for discussion of the Ambassadors program, the Point Of Entry project, the data ingestion tool, and the metrics/analytics proposal.

Thanks to the organizers and participants for a productive and illuminating weekend.

-Sumana Harihareswara
Volunteer Development Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation

News about the Bookshelf Project and new direction for Fellowship

My time as a Fellow of the Wikimedia Foundation has been divided between the Bookshelf Project and the Account Creation Improvement Project. But now my Fellowship has taken a new and exciting turn.

Since I started, the Bookshelf Project has grown steadily. We have more and more people helping out, and the number of translations is increasing every week. The brochure “Welcome to Wikipedia,” for instance, has been translated into five languages, most recently French, and it has been a popular handout for the newcomers in the Public Policy Initiative.

The Bookshelf pages have also become more easy to navigate. I have filled the pages with many of the videos and books and handouts that have been created previously, beside the new materials. In total, around 100 different works have been collected and organized on those pages. Hopefully these pages will become the go-to library for anyone who wants to find out more about Wikipedia and its sister projects. The address is easy to remember: http://bookshelf.wikimedia.org. If you have more material that you think fits in the Bookshelves, feel free to add to them.

But most exciting is this third piece of news:

Starting today, we will help you spread the Bookshelf materials. Go to the Bookshelf pages, select any material that you want to give out at a conference or event – and apply for printing money from the Wikimedia Foundation! We have a simplified grants process. See more details here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/Bookshelf Grants. With this grant we hope to help you reach out to many new individuals and inspire them to edit.

Lastly, in the upcoming weeks, the new Wikipedia Cheat Sheet will be finished. It is right now being designed and printed. If you want to translate it, we will make it very easy for you. Then you can get a grant and have it printed in just a few weeks.

This marks the end of my full-time engagement in the Bookshelf project, but I will still check in on it now and then, and I love to see what happens with it in the future.

What happens next?

One of the proposed designs for the new account creation processes.

One of the proposed designs for the new account creation processes.

With all of these milestones reached, my Fellowship changes. I will concentrate fully on the Account Creation Improvement Project. After having performed surveys and tests of the account creation process, we have discovered that this project can have a real impact on the number of people with new accounts that actually start to edit. So with a few volunteers and support from the tech staff, I have started working on an approach to the next tests. First we have set up a new tracking system. Now we are working on creating two high-quality account creation processes that are significantly different from the existing process. We will start testing these very soon and see how many more new users we can get to the point of starting to edit.

After about a month of testing, this will lead to an increased understanding of what we can do to get the new users to stay. Of course, we would love to have your input and ideas.

Lennart Guldbrandsson
Community Fellow

New interactive visualization shows global distribution of Wikipedia edits

Wikimedia Data Analyst Erik Zachte recently unveiled a new interactive visualization showing the global distribution of edits for various language editions of Wikipedia.

The animation shows a global map of edits made on May 10, 2011.

The animation shows a global map of edits made on May 10, 2011.

This first version allows users to see where edits are coming from for a given day. Right now, the day is fixed but fairly recent.

You can control the parameters of this interactive visualization by using keyboard shortcuts available in a “Help” menu (press ‘H’). For example, ‘E’ switches between different event markers.

Hit 'M' to switch to a black background, and 'E' to switch between different styles of event markers. Here, language codes are shown instead of bubbles.

Hit 'M' to switch to a black background, and 'E' to switch between different styles of event markers. Here, language codes are shown instead of bubbles.

The data behind these graphics comes from our Squid logs, that usually record about 400,000 edits a day. See Erik’s post to read more about how the visualizations were made.

By zooming on a particular area (‘+’ or mouse scroll), or filtering the edits by language (‘N’ or space bar), interesting things can surface. For example, bubble maps and heat maps reflect densely populated areas with easy Internet access.

Hit 'N' or the Space bar to display a specific language. Here, edits to the English Wikipedia are shown on a bubble map ('2').

Hit 'N' or the Space bar to display a specific language. Here, edits to the English Wikipedia are shown on a bubble map ('2').

Three types of displays are available, all showing the spatial distribution of edits over time in a different way: an accelerated animation of edits over a day (’1′), a bubble map of the same edits over a day (’2′), and a heat map of edits over a day (’3′).

The animation over the course of the day also shows the levels of activity depending on the time it is in various timezones. Compare for example the activity of the Spanish Wikipedia in Spain and Latin America over the course of the day.

Hit '3' to switch to the heat map of edits combined on a single day. This heat map shows edits to the Spanish Wikipedia, mostly distributed in Spain and Latin America.

Hit '3' to switch to the heat map of edits combined on a single day. This heat map shows edits to the Spanish Wikipedia, mostly distributed in Spain and Latin America.

Similarly, the map shows that most edits to the Chinese Wikipedia are made from outside of mainland China (Hong Kong and Taiwan):

Zoom in using the + key, or the mouse scroll.

Zoom in using the + key, or the mouse scroll.

Open the visualization and play with it yourself!

In the tradition of free software that Wikimedia is attached to, this visualization was entirely created using HTML5 (canvas) and JavaScript, and no proprietary tool is necessary to view the animation.

The visualization works in the most recent browsers. If for some reason it doesn’t work for you, below is a short video to give you an overview of what it looks like when animated.

The video is also available on Wikimedia Commons, along with more screenshots.


Guillaume Paumier

GLAMCampNYC: help us make mass uploads easier

Today, several Wikimedians and representatives from galleries, libraries, archives and museums (GLAM institutions) met in New York City to kick off GLAMCampNYC.  New York City’s public Science, Industry, and Business Library is hosting the event.

Liam Wyatt, the Wikimedia Foundation’s Cultural Partnerships Fellow (aka GLAM fellow), introduced two keynoters: Meg Bellinger, discussing open access at Yale, and Maarten Zeinstra, presenting the Europeana public domain calculator.  The conference continues through Sunday.  Participants are discussing and building the GLAM outreach wiki, writing documentation, sharing best practices, and building tools.

Developers at GLAMCamp are developing a data-munging tool, based on pywikipediabot, to aid in mass uploads (more details).  According to Wyatt, the most common requests from GLAM institutions are (1) mass upload of audiovisual media and (2) metrics, “easily exportable statistics based on analytics on a GLAM’s relationship with Wikimedia.”  The data-munging or data ingestion tool will aid in the import of metadata from large sets of files, thus speeding the difficult part of mass uploads.  Attendees will be hacking on it in sprints this weekend, starting 3pm-4:30pm UTC time tomorrow, Saturday the 21st. Join them in person (11am local time), or in #glamwiki on Freenode.

See notes from today’s general talks and discussion and from the discussion of the GLAM Ambassadors program, or follow #glamwiki and #glamcamp on Twitter and Identi.ca.

-Sumana Harihareswara
Volunteer Development Coordinator, Wikimedia Foundation

Developers go home after productive Berlin hackathon

These people make Wikipedia and MediaWiki awesome.

Most MediaWiki developers who attended the Berlin hackathon this weekend have left the German capital and returned home, after three days of collaborative coding, group discussions, short presentations, and bug fixing.

A lot of work was already accomplished on Friday and Saturday, including presentations on test frameworks, coding of new features, discussions on wikitext parsers, and a usability testing session.

Things were a bit slower on Sunday, but lack of sleep didn’t stop developers from coding and smashing bugs. Brandon Harris gave a short talk about identity, editor retention and social features. Domas Mituzas talked about how to improve performance; Tim Starling followed by discussing adding HipHop support for MediaWiki, and its planned deployment to Wikimedia sites.

Mark Bergsma also gave an overview of the situation of the Wikimedia infrastructure regarding IPv6 (and our participation in IPv6 Day) and Mathias Schindler discussed WebP support. All the live notes taken yesterday are available.

The rest of the day was used to continue to code, discuss and smash bugs. Some groups explored the city before returning home. The day ended with participants hacking and socializing at the C-base.

If you couldn’t attend, the videos of all the talks are available for you to watch (or re-watch). Many pictures of the event are already on Wikimedia Commons, and more will follow. Presentation slides will be added to the hackathon page as they come in.

We hope the live video streaming, real-time note taking, and IRCing / tweeting was useful for remote attendees; please tell us what we did right and what needs improving. We’d love to get feedback on what worked for you, and what didn’t.

We’d like to thank everyone who was involved in making this event awesome, and particularly the participants, who came from all over the world to work together to improve our technical platform.

Many thanks to the team from Wikimedia Deutschland as well, who masterminded the whole event: Nicole Ebber, Daniel Kinzler, Cornelius Kibelka, and the rest of their team.

Participants agreed they were looking forward to more hackathons, in Berlin and elsewhere. We’ll see you there!


Guillaume Paumier

Photo from Wikimedia Commons by Tobias Schumann, under CC-by-sa 3.0 Germany.

Berlin hackathon continues with group coding, discussions and bug squashing

With tired eyes, and fueled by ridiculously large amounts of coffee, Wikimedia developers and engineers are now starting their third and last day of collaborative coding at the Berlin “hackathon”.

The event, organized by Wikimedia Deutschland, has been going on since Friday. About a hundred participants are enjoying our third day at coworking / hackspace Betahaus.

Yesterday, more coding happened, and even more bugs were smashed: about 65 since we started on Friday. There remains plenty to work on during this hackathon, though, if you’d like to help.

Saturday afternoon was also devoted to the discussions about the possible evolutions of the MediaWiki parser (see notes), a step towards a visual editor for Wikipedia and other MediaWiki-powered sites. (“Visual editor” seems to have reached consensus as a more social class-neutral replacement for “rich text editor”.)

Yesterday, the hackathon also hosted a usability testing session on the Kiwix offline app, led by Ryan Kaldari. The ops team is continuing its ongoing work on HTTPS & IPv6, and Victor Vasiliev partially implemented a long-awaited feature for Wikimedia wikis: a global watchlist.

The day ended with a party (with free beer and food) organized by our friends from Wikia.

You can take a look at all the live notes taken yesterday. People are also taking photos, and more will follow.

Some talks that were originally scheduled for Saturday are happening today, including Brandon Harris’ short presentation on “identity”, Mark Bergsma’s on IPv6, and the discussions on performance and HipHop, with Domas Mituzas and Tim Starling.

You can participate remotely in real time by watching the live video stream (all talks are recorded), and participating in our live note-taking in Etherpad.

You can also join us on IRC in #mwhack11 or #mediawiki on Freenode, and follow our activity using the #mwhack11 hashtag on Twitter and Identi.ca.

This year’s motto is “talk less, code more”. Happy coding!


Guillaume Paumier

Wikimedia developers start second day of Berlin hackathon

Typical traffic lights in Berlin

Green light: You can code now!

MediaWiki developers and Wikimedia engineers are starting their second day of coding, discussing and bug-smashing today in Berlin, Germany. This “hackathon”, organized by Wikimedia Deutschland, started yesterday, and will last until tomorrow Sunday.

After a short introduction yesterday, participants quickly moved on to group discussions, short presentations and coding. The event is run as an unconference, and this format has proven to be quite effective so far.

Lightning talks yesterday included presentations about the new datacenter (by Mark Bergsma), Kiwix and offline (Emmanuel Engelhart), PhotoCommons (Hay Kranen), OpenStreetMap integration (Tim Adler), WikiLove (Ryan Kaldari), PHPunit (Ashar Voultoiz), the new mobile gateway (Patrick Reilly), community-oriented testing (Ryan Lane), Narayam (Purodha Blissenbach) and distributed JavaScript testing (Timo Tijhof).

Several bugs were also fixed yesterday, but there remains quite a bit to smash during this hackathon.

A lot of group discussions (e.g. about HipHop, and the MediaWiki release plan) and actual coding happened during the afternoon and evening. You can take a look at all the notes taken yesterday in real time.

Today’s talks include discussions on “Identity” (Brandon Harris), performance, including plans to use HipHop for PHP (Domas Mituzas and Tim Starling), as well as many discussions and short talks about wikitext parsers.

To participate remotely in real time: You can still watch the live video stream (all talks are recorded), and participate in our live note-taking in etherpad.

You can also join us on IRC in #mwhack11 or #mediawiki on Freenode, and follow our activity using the #mwhack11 hashtag on Twitter and Identi.ca.

Another way to participate is by testing some of the tools people are developing. For example, Purodha Blissenbach is looking for testers for Narayam (a keyboard mapping for Indic languages), and Hay Kranen would like people to test the PhotoCommons WordPress plugin. Please contact them if you want to get involved.

This year’s motto is “talk less, code more”. Happy coding!


Guillaume Paumier

Wikimedia tech crowd and MediaWiki developers gather in Berlin

Developers, engineers, laptops, food, and wi-fi.

MediaWiki developers and Wikimedia engineers have flown from all over the world to meet up in Berlin.

For the third time, Wikimedia Deutschland is organizing a “hackathon”, a coding event where developers work together to improve the MediaWiki software and the technological platform for Wikipedia.

The event started today at the betahaus, a coworking and social space in Berlin’s Kreuzberg neighborhood, close to Moritzplatz. It will last until Sunday; a rough schedule is available.

Two other groups of Wikimedians are also meeting this week-end at the betahaus: Wiki loves Monuments enthusiasts, and the Language Committee.

Work at the hackathon is notably focused on improvements in MediaWiki’s text editor, development tools, improvements in the parser, mobile apps, and bug fixing. We’re also having a few lightning talks.

These developer days are included in the program of the Berlin Web Week, a series of events happening in Berlin in May and bringing together Internet and software communities and industry players.

To participate remotely: join us on Twitter and Identi.ca, where we’re using the #mwhack11 hashtag. We’re posting links there to our public notes taken in real time.

You can also watch the live video stream (all talks are recorded), join us on IRC in #mwhack11 or #mediawiki on Freenode, and check out the event page on facebook.

This year’s motto is “talk less, code more”. Happy coding!


Guillaume Paumier

Long-time Editor AGK Reflects on the Past, Present and Future of Wikipedia

Hi, I’m Anthony, known as User:AGK on the many volunteer-written Wikimedia projects. Last week marked my fifth year as an administrator on the English Wikipedia, and my sixth year as a contributor. I was asked to write this post to give my thoughts on what it means to me to be a long-term contributor to projects like Wikipedia, and what I hope to see happen in the coming years.

Perhaps the biggest challenge for our project today is how to convert more readers into contributors. To me, the most important group to reach, and the one I will discuss a little in my short post here, are the internet users who have not yet discovered the fascinating concept of the “free encyclopedia that anybody can edit”. This concept is embodied in precisely those terms at the top of every Wikipedia article, beneath the article’s title. But there are only 25 Wikipedia editors for every *million* speakers of the English language, and Wikipedia is one of the most popular websites in the world. Evidently, we need to do more to get more of our readers to give a little back, too.

The basic premise of Wikipedia is fantastic: it is a website that any person can improve upon or add to. This collaborative model had me fascinated from the start, and, I am sure, has done the same for thousands of others. (If you are new to the Wikimedia Foundation’s projects, or never thought about where those millions of articles came from, then the briefest summary of the Wikimedia family would be that it is a volunteer-written and not-for-profit group of projects that aims to codify the world’s knowledge.)

I joined Wikipedia many years ago, when it was a different project, as many early contributors found it: by stumbling across an article entry through a Google search. I managed to add some information (all of which had to be ‘translated’ into the proper format by an experienced contributor, of course) and hit “save”. When I saw that my change was immediately visible on a page searchable by over half of the world, I was hooked. I registered an account, which I use to this day, and made a number of other alleged “improvements” (which more experienced editors also had to correct!).

I eventually found our help pages, and learned how to properly use the site. And whilst things are much easier now for new editors because of our better editing interface and help pages, Wikipedia is still a complex place; this is something that we must work on if we are to turn more readers into contributors. Moreover, many readers who do manage to edit a few pages or correct a few mistakes simply get bored and leave. We do not place enough emphasis on WikiProjects, Portals, and categories – all of which help to co-ordinate efforts at improving articles within related topics.

If you want to give your time to anything, then Wikipedia surely is a good choice. I continue to contribute for these reasons: Wikipedia is a fantastic project with a mission I genuinely believe is of value to humanity. Much of my work, as someone who is now an experienced editor, is in the field of resolving disputes about article content, which is an essential component of Wikipedia because as all decisions on the project are made by consensus—that is, by majority agreement of whichever editors have chosen to work on the article in question. I am part of the Wikipedia Mediation Committee, which provides formal mediation for disputes about article content that have not been resolved by simple discussion (as most disputes are on Wikipedia) or by earlier steps in the dispute-resolution process.

For those of you who do not know much about mediation on Wikipedia, I will briefly explain. Dispute-resolution works on a “carrot and stick” model: whereas the Arbitration Committee is the ‘stick’ (in that it hears evidence, then drafts a binding decision that adjudicates the dispute with a degree of finality), the Mediation Committee is the ‘carrot’ (in that it assigns a mediator to a dispute, who then hears the arguments of all the parties and then helps them draft a mutually acceptable compromise).

The Mediation Committee complements the work of the other mediation body on Wikipedia. Both are vital components of Wikipedia, and perpetually need more editors to work as neutral mediators. If you are a Wikipedia editor with a neutral, balanced temperament, please consider volunteering for the MedCab; anybody can! If you are experienced in dispute-resolution and have a few hours a week free, then consider submitting a nomination to the Mediation Committee. In either case, you’d be making a substantial contribution to the writing of the encyclopedia.

Wikipedia attracts contributors of almost every country in the world, and of every age. The project is a great way to work alongside others and do something genuinely good—for two minutes, or two hours, and for one night a week, or seven. If you’re reading this and you aren’t already part of the project, then please join. I’m glad I did, and I’m sure you will be too.

Anthony

User: AGK