Comments on: Wikimedia Foundation responds to Fox News

By: Fox acusa a Wikipedia de albergar pornografía infantil y Wales renuncia | eduangi.com

Thu, 13 May 2010 08:08:02 +0000

[...] ya publicó una explicación hace tiempo diciendo que la policía no le había requerido la retirada de ningún tipo de material y que los [...]

By: Burton Haynes

Burton Haynes — Wed, 12 May 2010 14:31:32 +0000

its very crucial to check internet activities of kids, that’s why emonitor has been created. Thanks again for great information.

By: PCHS-NJROTC

PCHS-NJROTC — Tue, 11 May 2010 21:23:44 +0000

I read the article, and it looks more like it’s Mr. Sanger that needs to be sued for libel, especially if he never actually complained to the FBI. It sounds like yet another “man on a mission” seeking to get Wikipedia webfiltered. And probably yet another to have minimal impact; most schools and corporations do not block the site despite so many similar attempts, such as http://wikipediaocd.wordpress.com/.

By: Turbulencias en Wikipedia tras una campaña que la acusa de "pornografía infantil" | Noticortos.com

Mon, 10 May 2010 21:06:20 +0000

[...] de Wikipedia ya había obligado el pasado 28 de abril a la Fundación Wikimedia a publicar una nota en el que informaba que ninguna policía le había requerido la retirada de ningún tipo de [...]

By: Wiki Censorship at SlideRulesYou.com

Wiki Censorship at SlideRulesYou.com — Mon, 10 May 2010 19:40:17 +0000

[...] Fox News has been poking its puritanical (and priapic) probe into the internet again. This time, Wikimedia were the focus of their campaign. Wiki is currently executing a large-scale deletion of what the Right-Wing news network refer to as “pornographic imagery”. Jimmy Wales, President of the Wikimedia Foundation, offered assurances that “educational images about sexuality” would remain, but there have been concerns among users that art, literature and images of historical artefacts could also end up being censored. After all, the standards by which Fox judge offensiveness are somewhat different to those of most people. Wiki’s Michael Snow said: “We encourage Wikimedia editors to scrutinise potentially offensive materials with the goal of assessing their educational or informational value, and to remove them from the projects if there is no such value.” [...]

By: hahnchen

hahnchen — Sat, 08 May 2010 20:25:30 +0000

Thanks for folding, Wikimedia. Way to give Fox yet another way to self aggrandise themselves.

http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/05/07/wikipedia-purges-porn/

Fox News 1 :Wikimedia 0

By: Someone

Someone — Sat, 08 May 2010 20:07:58 +0000

I am a full supporter of Wikimedia and Wikipedia. That being said, Fox News basically stated that there is a lot of graphic content on wikipedia, which is true. It also stated that Wikimedia is taking action to clean it all up, which I think is appropriate and NECESSARY. Too bad you couldn’t think of it earlier so the media wouldn’t have to publish it…

By: TheLastBrainLeft

TheLastBrainLeft — Fri, 07 May 2010 22:24:52 +0000

I read the story. It’s sensational but not factually incorrect. People who think there should be a lawsuit know nothing about libel law.

By: Tyciol

Tyciol — Mon, 03 May 2010 07:56:55 +0000

Hail Citizendium

By: Accuse di Pedofilia a Wikipedia e Una Lezione di Trasparenza | Infoservi.it

Accuse di Pedofilia a Wikipedia e Una Lezione di Trasparenza | Infoservi.it — Mon, 03 May 2010 06:31:10 +0000

[...] raccontando l’intera storia, da dove nascevano i pettegolezzi, il supporto dei colleghi e del datore di lavoro, come la sta vivendo lui e cerca di astrarre fino a fare una microriflessione sulla “diffamazione [...]