Wikimedia gets ready for some big changes

In April, the Wikimedia Foundation is rolling out the first of several significant changes to the user experience of Wikipedia as part of our usability and user experience program.

  • We are changing our default look to a new theme we call “Vector” which makes essential functions easier to find.
  • Editing pages will be easier, thanks to a new editing toolbar that makes it easier to insert links and tables, and a built-in “cheatsheet” to access help for the most commonly used functions.
  • All users will also see that the site layout has changed noticeably.  We’ve simplified the site navigation, relocated the search box to satisfy user expectations and to follow other web standards, reduced some of the clutter, and made sure that the new features work with different resolutions, browser formats, and window sizings.

We will begin deployment of these changes in the week of April 5 on Wikimedia Commons, the media repository used by Wikipedia. Provided that we don’t encounter major hiccups with this first roll-out, we are planning deployment of the changes to Wikipedia in late April, beginning with the English Wikipedia, followed by other languages. Logged-in users will have the option to return to the classic functionality using a one-click process.

These improvements have been in use by more than 500,000 “beta” users over the last six months, and have been localized, including right-to-left language support. (More localization work is welcome — please join our localization rally if you can.  Eighty-percent of users who have tried the new “beta” apperance have stayed within the beta program.  These changes are also the result of qualitative user research undertaken by the Wikimedia Foundation.

On the English Wikipedia specifically, we’re also enabling the creation of PDFs files and printed books from Wikipedia articles to all users (a service previously restricted to logged-in users only). And, we’ll start roll-out of a refined version of the well-known Wikipedia globe logo, correcting small mistakes and representing new languages.

These changes are only the beginning. We’re also testing a set of additional editing and navigation improvements that we are planning to implement later this year:

  • We’re reducing the amount of wiki code users see in the edit system and making it possible to change data in tables and information boxes through simple forms.
  • We’re cleaning up the edit page itself, to use more understandable language and get rid of confusing clutter.
  • We’re providing a new outline tool to navigate a long article while you’re editing it.
  • We’re simplifying the search by getting rid of the confusing combination of the “go” and “search” buttons, moving instead towards one search button.

These changes will be available as opt-in beta features to registered users to allow wider testing, and will be validated by further user research before deployment. Finally, we’re also working on an improved interface for uploading images and video, and searching our existing multimedia repository. See the multimedia project hub for more information.

Our overarching objective is to make it easier to find and contribute knowledge in Wikipedia and its sister projects. Volunteer participation is the essence of everything we do; our job is to facilitate and support that volunteer work. Continually improving the experience our projects is now a core mandate of the Wikimedia Foundation.

The work over the past year has been funded by the Stanton Foundation, and our ongoing work on multimedia improvements is funded in part by the Ford Foundation and conducted in partnership with Kaltura. We’re very grateful to these partners and funders for supporting our mission.

Software developers are invited to review this under-the-hood explanation in our technical blog that describes the impact of these changes on bots, scripts, and gadgets interfacing with Wikimedia projects. We’ve also started a Q&A on the Usability wiki that we’ll develop through the roll-out.  You can use the Q&A ‘talk’ page to propose other questions. Check back in with the Wikimedia blog for regular updates throughout the process.

Thanks for your interest,

Naoko Komura, Project Manager, User Experience 

12 Show

12 Comments on Wikimedia gets ready for some big changes

Totu 6 years

Looks horrible to me, and I will not be using this new design. I do not understand this new trend of making text appear in a huge pile without borders or anything. It’s the same with the new YouTube layout. Just looks very messy (especially text), hard to read and incomplete. Not cool. Not cool at all.

Naoko 6 years

@ Enbéká Yes, you can change back to Monobook. We will provide an easy way to switch back to Monobook if you prefer your current default environment.

Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy 6 years

Excellent! I support this interface!

Enbéká 6 years

Can we change back to Monobook or you will delete it? (I hate vector but monobook is ok).

Naoko 6 years

@ Ludwig We did consider introducing fixed width, but editing usability improvements took the priority and we had to postponed to future implementation. Parul’s proposed design can be found here.

@ cjk We agree that basic editing features need to be reserved in case JavaScript is not enabled. We use JavaScript to increase the interactiveness and all features fall back to the basic editing mode when JavaScript is not enabled. If you encounter graceful fall back is not happening, please let us know via bugzilla under UsabilityInitiative.

@ ex Glad to hear that you are excited about the new user experience of Wikimedia projects. :-)

Jyu.. 6 years


ex 6 years

I believe it is just another wonderful improvement for wikipedia. And it has been such a long time since major make over and i am really looking forward to see the new site.

leigh blackall 6 years

Thanks for the update. Exciting news! Any word on when all the sister projects can expect it? I’m specifically interested on Books and Versity. Also, is mobile included in your project scope? I was really pleased with Wikipedia mobile, keen for it on Books and Versity, but as yet no progress…

Tilman Hesse 6 years

I prefer the search field on the left.

Before the change there was page content on the right, and menu structure on the left. A clear structural and optical division. With the change, there is a mix up and layout becomes less clear.

cjk 6 years

WP has to continue working without JavaScript as it used to — to remain acessible (as in: accessibility). The best way to ensure this is that all functionality is there when you only have /usr/bin/w3m available.

(I also deactivated the toolbar for me because it’s slow to load and I don’t need it at all.)

Ludwig 6 years

IMHO, the new layout is a great improvement. Way better usability. Thanks! I wonder, why the site still has no max-width. Wikipedia is one of the few websites that requires me to change my browser window size.

Michael Müller 6 years

Please try to avoid JavaScript. Pages are really unreadable. Sorry, I have found at the moment as an example only this page in English:

German e.g.:
Disable JavaScript, Zoom into the page and look on the top layout.
If this “flags” are big enough they spread without JavaScript over the text so it is unreadable.
In the new design they are below the text, e.g.
But the layout is still not very readable.

Please compare with activated JavaScript.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *