<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More story in WP history&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/09/09/more-story-in-wp-history/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/09/09/more-story-in-wp-history/</link>
	<description>News from inside the Wikimedia Foundation.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben Yates</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/09/09/more-story-in-wp-history/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Yates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 22:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=101#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>Great stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Axel Boldt</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/09/09/more-story-in-wp-history/comment-page-1/#comment-1049</link>
		<dc:creator>Axel Boldt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 04:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=101#comment-1049</guid>
		<description>I find that WikiDashboard at http://wikidashboard.parc.com/ presents article history statistics in much more compelling format. The most important information, namely when each of the main contributors were most active on the article, cannot be gotten from our tool; statistics like &quot;mean time between edits&quot; are next to meaningless, and long lists of single-edit anon IPs just clutter up the display without providing any insight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find that WikiDashboard at <a href="http://wikidashboard.parc.com/" rel="nofollow">http://wikidashboard.parc.com/</a> presents article history statistics in much more compelling format. The most important information, namely when each of the main contributors were most active on the article, cannot be gotten from our tool; statistics like &#8220;mean time between edits&#8221; are next to meaningless, and long lists of single-edit anon IPs just clutter up the display without providing any insight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
