<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: robots.txt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/04/29/robotstxt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/04/29/robotstxt/</link>
	<description>News from inside the Wikimedia Foundation.org</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dcoetzee</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/04/29/robotstxt/comment-page-1/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>Dcoetzee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 11:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=28#comment-288</guid>
		<description>There have been recent proposals to noindex all talk pages on the English Wikipedia - I&#039;m opposed to this on the general principle that it&#039;s best to let the search engines index as much as possible and sort out relevance on their own (determining relevance of webpages is what search engines do, after all). As long as talk pages aren&#039;t misleadingly portrayed as sources of factual information, rather than opinions of individuals, I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a problem - and a forum interface for talk pages will go a long way towards cementing that impression.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been recent proposals to noindex all talk pages on the English Wikipedia &#8211; I&#8217;m opposed to this on the general principle that it&#8217;s best to let the search engines index as much as possible and sort out relevance on their own (determining relevance of webpages is what search engines do, after all). As long as talk pages aren&#8217;t misleadingly portrayed as sources of factual information, rather than opinions of individuals, I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a problem &#8211; and a forum interface for talk pages will go a long way towards cementing that impression.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Gerard</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/04/29/robotstxt/comment-page-1/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator>David Gerard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=28#comment-149</guid>
		<description>@thewub: If you follow &lt;a href=&quot;http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2008-April/thread.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wikitech-l lately&lt;/a&gt;, you&#039;ll see there&#039;s a lot of active ongoing work on the internal search - it&#039;s noticeably better of late.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@thewub: If you follow <a href="http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-l/2008-April/thread.html" rel="nofollow">wikitech-l lately</a>, you&#8217;ll see there&#8217;s a lot of active ongoing work on the internal search &#8211; it&#8217;s noticeably better of late.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the wub</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/04/29/robotstxt/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>the wub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 21:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=28#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the Foundation could concentrate some developer time and funding on improving our own search system. This would reduce reliance on external sites, and allow broader exclusion of &quot;working&quot; pages from Google etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the Foundation could concentrate some developer time and funding on improving our own search system. This would reduce reliance on external sites, and allow broader exclusion of &#8220;working&#8221; pages from Google etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NonvocalScream</title>
		<link>http://blog.wikimedia.org/2008/04/29/robotstxt/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>NonvocalScream</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.wikimedia.org/?p=28#comment-137</guid>
		<description>Very informative.  Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very informative.  Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
